Personal tools
Transportation Planning and Wildlife copied.

     

    Wildlife Crossing along Highway 29, Fakahatchee Strand - Has a secondary wildlife bridge (white sand area) that crosses a canal leading to the underpass with fencing.

     

    Roads as a barrier to animal movement, are considered one of the major determinants of functional connectivity across our landscapes. The use of wildlife highway crossing structures at noted intersections with greenway linkages (habitat corridors - rivers, streams, lake edges, wetalnds, certain upland areas, etc.) offers a method to reduce transportation-related, wildlife mortality and restore connectivity to the landscape. Road projects at many scales (National, state, regional or local) need to pay more attention to designing for the maintenance of wildlife movement throughout our communities.  Below is a growing list of resources that may help your community to better plan for continued wildlife connectivity.

    Wildlife Transportation Planning

    Planning for Transportation Facilities and Wildlife - Chapter 8 of Wildlife Habitat Planning Strategies, Design Features and Best Management Practices for Florida Communities and Landowners

     

    1. East Collier County Wildlife Movement Study- SR 29, CR 846, and CR 858 Wildlife Crossing Project - Final Report.   (Large File - Approximately 25 MB - But worth it.   Download is from the UCF Spice Lab and other publications of interest are also available)
    SUMMARY _ Roads are one of the greatest threats to wildlife. Especially in areas with high traffic volume, wildlife crossing structures are needed at carefully selected locations along roads in order to allow wildlife to successfully cross highways and maintain connectivity and gene flow within and among populations. Design of crossing structures can benefit from data on unsuccessful crossing locations, but whenever possible should be combined with data on successful crossing locations and a broader look at the landscape context of the crossing, including the adjacent topography, vegetation, and land use.
    To determine candidate sites for wildlife crossing structures to maintain/restore large-scale functional landscape connectivity for Florida panthers and other wildlife by monitoring and analyzing wildlife movement patterns along the SR 29, CR 846, and CR 858 highway corridors adjacent to designated stewardship areas.
    2.  US 331 WILDLIFE IMPACT STUDY. Final Report. September 2005, by: Daniel J. Smith, Ph.D., Reed F. Noss, Ph.D., Davis-Shine Professor of Conservation Biology, University of Central Floridaand, Thomas S. Hoctor, Ph.D., Research Scientist, GeoPlan? Center Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Florida.  Part 1 (Intro), Part 2 (Main Body), Part 3 (Appendix), and Part 4 (Appendix).
    US 331 is a major two-lane highway that bisects the combined Eglin-Nokuse conservation area.  The average annual daily traffic level is about 11,000 vehicles. Rapid growth and development in the coastal areas of Walton County have recently highlighted the need to widen the road to four lanes for hurricane evacuation purposes. The authors used a comprehensive approach that employed several methods to determine the current and potential impacts of US 331 on wildlife resources in the Nokuse-Eglin habitat corridor in Walton County, Florida. These methods included roadkill and track surveys, mark-recapture and existing culvert wildlife use studies, and GIS analysis of habitat types and configuration. The study used each method to evaluate road impacts on different taxa and used this multi-species approach to determine effects of the road on presence and movement behavior for suites of wildlife (e.g., primarily carnivores, selected herptiles, and small mammals).

    Dive into the Resources


    Good Links! 
    1.  Wildlife, Fisheriesand Transportation Web Gateway by The Center for Transportation and the Environment provides transportation agencies and their partners with access to information about current research, best practices, policy issues, training opportunities, and events on the relationship between surface transportation development and wildlife and fisheries ecology.
    2. Infra Eco network Europe (IENE), established in 1996, is a European network of authorities and experts involved in the phenomena of habitat fragmentation caused by the construction and use of linear transport infrastructure, especially motorways, railways and canals (waterways).
    3. A Computer Model for Exploring Highway-Wildlife Relationships - Researchers in the University of Florida's Landscape Ecology Program have devised a solution. They have developed a Geographic Information System (GIS) computer model that captures, manipulates, displays, and combines spatial information such as hydrology, land use, species distribution, and existing roads and greenways.

    You are here: Home Wiki Planning for Transportation Facilities and Wildlife Transportation Planning and Wildlife